The legal environment surrounding noncompete agreements in California has undergone significant changes recently, necessitating a deeper understanding and strategic adaptation from both employers and employees. California, known for its progressive approach to employment law, has further solidified its stance against the enforceability of noncompete agreements. This comprehensive guide delves into the intricacies of the new legislation, providing a detailed analysis of its implications and actionable insights for navigating this changing legal landscape.
Understanding California’s Stance on Noncompetes
Historical Perspective and Legal Framework
For decades, California has maintained a robust policy against noncompete agreements, rooted in its commitment to foster innovation and employee mobility. The foundation of this stance is the California Business and Professions Code section 16600, which declares all contractual covenants that restrain anyone from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business as void, barring a few exceptions. These exceptions are primarily limited to scenarios involving the sale of a business, the dissolution of partnerships, or the termination of interests in limited liability companies. As a result, most noncompetes with California employees have been traditionally seen as unenforceable.
SB 699: A New Era in Noncompete Legislation
The California legislature, recognizing that employers often use noncompete agreements for their deterrent effect, despite their general unenforceability, enacted SB 699. This legislation, taking effect on January 1, 2024, explicitly prohibits employers from entering into or attempting to enforce noncompete agreements that are void under California law. This includes agreements signed by employees while working outside of California but now employed in the state, thereby extending the reach of California’s policy against restraints on trade to a broader demographic.
Key Provisions of SB 699 and Its Implications
Expanding the Scope Beyond California Borders
One of the groundbreaking aspects of SB 699 is its applicability to situations where noncompete agreements were signed out of state. For instance, consider an employee who previously worked in Utah, a state with a more lenient stance on noncompetes, and then moved to California for a new job. Under SB 699, even if the noncompete was valid under Utah law, it becomes unenforceable once the employee begins working in California.
Civil Violations and Employer Liability
Employers that enter into or enforce unlawful noncompete agreements face civil violations. The law mandates that any such action taken by employers will be deemed a civil offense, thereby increasing the legal risks associated with noncompliant noncompete practices.
New Remedies for Employees under SB 699
Litigation and Enforcement
Prior to SB 699, legal actions in California regarding noncompetes typically focused on seeking declaratory relief. However, the new law empowers employees with additional remedies. They can now sue for damages, injunctive relief, and even claim reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. Notably, there is no equivalent provision for employers’ attorneys’ fees, even if they prevail in litigation over SB 699.
Independent Contractors and Grey Areas
There remains an open question regarding the law’s application to independent contractors. While noncompetes between businesses and their independent contractors could be void under section 16600, the specific implications under SB 699 are yet to be fully clarified.
AB 1076: Codifying and Expanding the Void on Noncompetes
Comprehensive Invalidity of Noncompetes
AB 1076 serves to codify existing case law, reiterating that any noncompete, regardless of how narrowly tailored, is void in the employment context. This expands the invalidation of noncompete agreements beyond just contracts where the restrained party is a direct signatory.
New Notice Requirements for Employers
A critical component of AB 1076 is the introduction of a notice requirement. Employers are obligated to inform current and former employees, whose contracts included an unlawful noncompete, about the void nature of these clauses. This notification, required to be in writing and individualized, must be delivered to the last known address and email of the employees. Failure to comply with this notice requirement constitutes a violation of the California Unfair Competition Law, potentially leading to civil penalties.
Actionable Steps for Employers
Compliance and Contractual Review
Employers should proactively review their employment contracts to ensure compliance with the new laws. This includes evaluating noncompetes signed by employees outside California, as they may no longer be enforceable once the employee begins working in the state. A diversified approach to protecting confidential and trade secret information is recommended, as reliance solely on noncompete agreements may lead to vulnerabilities.
Identification and Notification
Employers must identify potentially non-compliant agreements with both current and former California-resident employees. This includes agreements signed in other states that are now unenforceable under California law. It’s crucial to correct non-compliant agreements with current employees and notify former employees accordingly.
Conclusion: A Paradigm Shift in Noncompete Agreements
The introduction of SB 699 and AB 1076 represents a paradigm shift in California’s approach to noncompete agreements. These laws not only reaffirm the state’s stance against restrictions on employee mobility but also introduce stringent requirements and penalties for non-compliance. Employers must navigate this new landscape carefully, while employees gain stronger legal footing to challenge unlawful noncompete practices. As the legal landscape continues to evolve, staying informed and adapting to these changes will be crucial for all parties involved in employment agreements in California.
► Getting Legal Help
AXIS Legal Counsel’s Business and Corporations Practice provides legal advice to numerous businesses with a wide range of business matters. Axis represent small, medium-sized, and large business clients with a wide variety of business and corporate law matters. We represent early-stage companies as well as established businesses on a wide variety of business law matters, ranging from contracts and transactions, intellectual property, labor/employment law, business financing, mergers and acquisitions, real estate, insurance, business succession planning, and general advice and counsel. For information on retaining AXIS Legal Counsel to represent your business in connection with any legal matter, contact [email protected] for a confidential consultation.
► Our Business, Corporate Law and Securities Practice Areas
|
|
► Read our Business FAQs
Our FAQs answer the most common issues faced by startups and businesses. We have an extensive FAQ Library that covers the most common questions we get from businesses, as well as FAQs on recent changes in law affecting businesses . ►Visit our Entire FAQ Library |
► Learn About Our Recent Projects
Have we counseled businesses like yours? All the time. We have represented a variety of business clients in numerous industries across multiple disciplines and practice matters. Here are some of the highlights: |
► AS SEEN IN
Our talented legal counsel has been quoted in a number of press outlets, including the following:
► Serving Clients Nationwide and in 22+ Countries Internationally
We represent clients throughout the U.S. and in 22+ countries internationally.
