As a startup founder, you may have heard the term “double trigger acceleration clauses” in discussions with potential investors or during negotiations with your company’s board of directors. But what are they, and why are they important? In this article, we will explore the concept of double trigger acceleration clauses, their reasons for use, and why they are necessary in certain situations for startup founders.

In the world of startups, equity is a critical component of compensation for founders, employees, and investors alike. Equity can provide incentives to attract and retain talent, align the interests of employees with those of the company, and reward stakeholders for the company’s success. However, equity can also be subject to vesting, which is a mechanism that grants ownership of equity over time or upon the occurrence of certain events. Vesting is commonly used to ensure that founders and employees remain committed to the company’s long-term success.

One of the challenges faced by startup founders is retaining key employees and protecting their equity in the event of an acquisition or change in control of the company. This is where double trigger acceleration clauses come into play. Double trigger acceleration clauses are provisions typically included in stock option or restricted stock agreements that allow for the acceleration of vesting of equity in certain circumstances, specifically when two triggers are met. Let’s dive deeper into this concept and understand the reasons for their use and why they are necessary.

What are Double Trigger Acceleration Clauses?

Double trigger acceleration clauses are provisions in equity agreements that provide for the accelerated vesting of equity when two specified triggers occur. The first trigger is usually a change in control event, such as an acquisition or merger of the company. The second trigger is typically a termination of employment without cause or for good reason within a certain period of time after the change in control event.

In simpler terms, double trigger acceleration clauses are designed to protect founders and key employees in the event of a change in control of the company. They ensure that if the company is acquired, and the founder or employee is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason, their equity will vest immediately, allowing them to fully participate in the benefits of the acquisition.

Reasons for Use of Double Trigger Acceleration Clauses

There are several reasons why double trigger acceleration clauses are used in equity agreements for startup founders:

1. Retention of Key Employees: One of the primary reasons for using double trigger acceleration clauses is to retain key employees during a period of uncertainty that may arise from a change in control event. During such events, employees may feel uncertain about the future of their role and the company, and may consider leaving to explore other opportunities. Double trigger acceleration clauses provide an incentive for key employees to stay with the company and continue to contribute to its success, as they know their equity will vest if certain conditions are met.
2. Protection of Equity: Equity is a valuable asset for founders and employees, and it represents their ownership in the company. In the event of an acquisition or change in control, there may be a risk that the equity could be diluted or lost altogether. Double trigger acceleration clauses protect the equity of founders and key employees by ensuring that their equity vests immediately upon the occurrence of certain triggers, mitigating the risk of losing or diluting their ownership in the company.
3. Alignment of Interests: Equity is often used as a tool to align the interests of founders, employees, and investors with those of the company. By providing double trigger acceleration clauses, startup founders can ensure that the interests of key employees are aligned with the best interests of the company. This is because employees are incentivized to work towards the success of the company, knowing that they will benefit from the equity if the company is acquired or goes through a change in control event.

4. Attraction of Talent: In the competitive landscape of startups, attracting and retaining top talent is crucial for success. Double trigger acceleration clauses can serve as a powerful incentive for prospective employees to join a startup, knowing that their equity will be protected in the event of an acquisition or change in control. It can also help retain existing employees who may have concerns about the future of their equity in the face of potential changes in the company’s ownership or management.
5. Negotiating Tool: Double trigger acceleration clauses can also serve as a negotiating tool for founders during investment or financing rounds. It can be used as a point of discussion and negotiation with investors or board members to ensure that the interests of founders and key employees are adequately protected in the event of a change in control. This can help founders have a stronger position in negotiations and ensure that their equity is safeguarded.

Necessity of Double Trigger Acceleration Clauses

For startup founders, double trigger acceleration clauses can be necessary for several reasons:

1. Risk Mitigation: Startups are inherently risky ventures, and the landscape can change quickly. A change in control event, such as an acquisition or merger, can introduce uncertainties and risks for founders and key employees. Double trigger acceleration clauses provide a safeguard against such risks by ensuring that equity vests immediately if certain triggers occur, mitigating the potential loss or dilution of equity in the event of a change in control.
2. Protection of Founders’ Interests: As a founder, your equity in the company represents your ownership stake and your hard work in building the company. Double trigger acceleration clauses protect your interests by ensuring that your equity vests immediately in case of a change in control, providing you with the opportunity to fully participate in the financial benefits of the acquisition.
3. Retention of Key Employees: Key employees are crucial to the success of a startup, and their departure during a period of uncertainty, such as a change in control event, can be detrimental to the company. Double trigger acceleration clauses help retain key employees by providing an incentive for them to stay with the company and continue contributing to its growth, knowing that their equity will vest if certain conditions are met.
4. Alignment of Interests: Double trigger acceleration clauses align the interests of founders and key employees with those of the company and its stakeholders. It ensures that employees are incentivized to work towards the success of the company even in the face of potential changes in ownership or management, as their equity will vest upon the occurrence of specific triggers.

Considerations for Double Trigger Acceleration Clauses

While double trigger acceleration clauses can be valuable for startup founders, there are some considerations to keep in mind:

1. Negotiation and Customization: Double trigger acceleration clauses are not standard and can be subject to negotiation and customization. The terms and conditions of the clauses, such as the triggers, the acceleration percentage, and the time period for the triggers to be met, can vary and should be carefully negotiated to align with the specific circumstances of the startup and the interests of all parties involved.
2. Impact on Other Equity Agreements: Double trigger acceleration clauses can have implications on other equity agreements within the company, such as stock option plans or restricted stock agreements. It’s essential to carefully review and consider the impact of double trigger acceleration clauses on the overall equity structure and ensure that they are consistent with the company’s overall equity compensation strategy.
3. Legal and Tax Implications: Double trigger acceleration clauses may have legal and tax implications that vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the startup. It’s crucial to seek legal and tax advice from qualified professionals to fully understand the implications and potential consequences of implementing double trigger acceleration clauses.

4. Change in Control Definition: The definition of a change in control event can vary depending on how it is defined in the double trigger acceleration clause. It’s essential to carefully review and understand the specific definition used in the clause, as it can impact when and how the acceleration is triggered. For example, some clauses may define a change in control event as a certain percentage of ownership change, while others may define it as a change in the majority of the board of directors. Understanding the definition of change in control is critical to ensure that the triggers are accurately aligned with the company’s circumstances and expectations.
5. Company’s Growth Prospects: Double trigger acceleration clauses may not be necessary for all startups, especially those with high growth prospects and long-term exit strategies. In such cases, founders may prioritize retaining equity for a longer period to align with the company’s growth plans and maximize the financial benefits of a successful exit. It’s essential to carefully consider the growth prospects and exit strategy of the company before implementing double trigger acceleration clauses, as they may not always be the most suitable option.
6. Investor Considerations: Implementing double trigger acceleration clauses may require negotiation and agreement from investors, especially if it impacts their equity or rights in any way. It’s crucial to consider the perspective of investors and their expectations when implementing double trigger acceleration clauses, as it may affect the overall dynamics of the investor-founder relationship. Open communication and transparency with investors can help ensure that their concerns are addressed, and any necessary approvals are obtained.

Conclusion

Double trigger acceleration clauses can be valuable tools for startup founders to protect their equity and retain key employees in the event of a change in control. They provide a safeguard against potential risks and uncertainties associated with acquisitions, mergers, or other change in control events. However, it’s crucial to carefully consider the specific circumstances of the startup, negotiate and customize the clauses, and seek legal and tax advice to ensure that they align with the company’s interests and overall equity compensation strategy.

Founders should also consider the impact of double trigger acceleration clauses on other equity agreements, the company’s growth prospects, and the perspective of investors. Ultimately, the decision to implement double trigger acceleration clauses should be made after careful consideration of the company’s unique circumstances, long-term goals, and the interests of all stakeholders involved.

In conclusion, double trigger acceleration clauses can be a valuable tool for startup founders to protect their equity and retain key employees, but they should be carefully considered, negotiated, and customized to align with the specific circumstances of the company. Founders should seek legal and tax advice and engage in open communication with investors to ensure that the implementation of double trigger acceleration clauses is done in the best interest of the company and its stakeholders.

 

► Getting Legal Help

AXIS Legal Counsel’s Business and Corporations Practice provides legal advice to numerous businesses with a wide range of business matters. Axis  represent small, medium-sized, and large business clients with a wide variety of business and corporate law matters. We represent early-stage companies as well as established businesses on a wide variety of business law matters, ranging from contracts and transactions, intellectual property, labor/employment law, business financing, mergers and acquisitions, real estate, insurance, business succession planning, and general advice and counsel.  For information on retaining AXIS Legal Counsel to represent your business in connection with any legal matter, contact [email protected]  for a confidential consultation.

► Our Business, Corporate Law and Securities Practice Areas

Corporate Law Small Business Contracts & Agreements Labor & Employment Intellectual Property Securities Law Shareholders Directors and Officers Mergers & Acquisitions Business Sales Cryptocurrencies

Securities Law Securities Offerings PPMs LPs, LLCs, and Corporations Real Estate Investment Trusts Investor Pools Angel Investments & Private Equity Leveraged Financings Debts and Debt Notes Convertible Notes Regulation D, A, CF, and S Offerings

 

► Read our Business FAQs Our FAQs answer the most common issues faced by startups and  businesses. We have an extensive FAQ Library that covers the most common questions we get from businesses, as well as FAQs on recent changes in  law affecting businesses . ►Visit our Entire FAQ Library

► Learn About Our Recent Projects Have we counseled businesses like yours? All the time. We have represented a variety of business clients in numerous industries across multiple disciplines and practice matters. Here are some of the highlights:

 

► AS SEEN IN

Our talented legal counsel has been quoted in a number of press outlets, including the following:

► Serving Clients Nationwide and in 22+ Countries Internationally

We represent clients throughout the U.S. and in 22+ countries internationally.